The price of the Aster crypto token has been a study in contradictions. After touching a record high of approximately $2.43, it entered a sharp correction, shedding value at a rate that unnerved short-term holders. The price has since found a tentative floor, trading around $1.80 and coiling in a zone that technical analysts describe with a certain palpable excitement. The chart, they say, is primed.
To the chart-watchers, the current price range of $1.60–$1.80 is a “hot support” zone. This is a level where, historically, buying pressure has materialized to reverse declines. Analyst Michaël van de Poppe, a voice followed by many in the space, has noted that similar setups have preceded rebounds of 15% to 35%. This observation is amplified by the presence of a falling wedge pattern on the four-hour chart—a classic technical formation that often signals an impending bullish reversal. If this pattern holds and a breakout occurs, a measured move could propel the Aster price back toward its previous highs of $2.22–$2.45, representing a rally of over 35%. Some traders are even more optimistic. One, going by the handle "BitcoinHabebe," has called this range a zone "for accumulation," predicting a move to $3 in October should the support hold decisively.
This is the clean, elegant narrative presented by the lines on a screen. But technical analysis is not a monolithic discipline. For every bullish pattern, there is often a bearish one lurking in the same data, its interpretation dependent on the eye of the beholder. In this case, it’s a descending triangle. This formation is characterized by a series of lower highs pressing down on a flat support line—the very $1.60-$1.80 floor the bulls are defending. It suggests that buyers are progressively losing strength, unable to push the price back to its previous peaks. A break below this floor would invalidate the falling wedge and confirm the triangle, signaling that sellers have seized control. The measured downside target for such a breakdown is grim: a drop toward $1.26.
When Technicals Meet Economic Gravity
The Fundamental Gravity
Technical patterns, however compelling, are ultimately just a graphical representation of market sentiment. They are a reflection of supply and demand, not the cause. And when I look past the charts, my analysis finds a far more concrete and formidable force scheduled to arrive on October 17: a massive token unlock. This is the part of the data that I find genuinely concerning for the bullish case.
On that date, 183.13 million ASTER tokens are set to enter circulation. At current prices, that represents a supply injection of approximately $325 million. This isn't a trivial amount; it’s equivalent to about 11% of the Aster coin’s entire market capitalization being released in a single day. The standard argument against panic is that the Aster DEX ecosystem is liquid enough to handle it. The project boasts nearly $1 billion in daily trading volume and holds over $2.26 billion in total value locked (TVL), metrics that suggest a deep and active market. The theory is that this liquidity can absorb the new supply without a catastrophic price impact. It might even be framed as a "buy the dip" opportunity for large players.
This is where a methodological critique becomes necessary. Is all volume created equal? A significant portion of trading volume on decentralized exchanges can be leverage-fueled or algorithmic, not necessarily indicative of organic, long-term demand. It measures churn, not conviction. To assume that $1 billion in daily volume represents a billion dollars of fresh capital waiting to absorb new supply is a potentially flawed premise.
This view is echoed by a more bearish contingent of market observers. Trader Gordon, who claims to have profited substantially by shorting ASTER, points directly to the project's tokenomics as the primary headwind. His argument looks beyond the single October event, noting that roughly $700 million worth of ASTER is scheduled to unlock by the end of the year. He warns the token may "keep bleeding" as this predictable wave of new supply hits the market. The project team itself seems to acknowledge this risk, as they are reportedly considering a vesting schedule for airdrop recipients to mitigate the downside. That’s not typically a measure taken by a team who believes the market can effortlessly absorb the supply.
We are left with two fundamentally opposed theses. One is based on the interpretation of historical price patterns, suggesting a coiled spring ready to rebound. The other is based on the unassailable mathematics of supply and demand. The price has corrected by more than 25%—to be more exact, 25.5% from its peak—placing it at a technical crossroads. But the looming unlock is not a pattern; it is a certainty. The bullish case requires the market's appetite for ASTER to be so voracious that it can swallow a $325 million supply increase (the first of several) without indigestion. My analysis suggests that is a very optimistic assumption.
###
An Unbalanced Equation
###
Technical chart patterns are stories traders tell themselves about the future. A $325 million token unlock, representing 11% of the market cap, is an economic reality. In a contest between a compelling story and a simple, brutal equation of supply and demand, the equation almost always wins. The question isn't if this new supply will apply downward pressure, but how much the existing support can withstand before it breaks.
Reference article source：
